Sullivan says that the hate harbored by victims and survivors of certain genocides is justified. If the man had been straight then things would not have been blown out of proportion. They are distinct in that they focus on a particular characteristic, although they tell about the victims, as in sexism, racism, and homophobia.
It encourages those that strive for attention to commit hate crimes. And for the son, I can see that kicking was a little extreme but, the gay man did play a role in his anger and hosed him for no reason.
Prison is suppose to be an undesirable place that makes inmates not want to repeat their crime and have to return. All he was saying was now a gaudy and possibly insensitive parade float turns even innocent men into racists.
Both of such quotes display the lifeless atmosphere of the prison.
We can try to educate individuals and expose them to other cultures. It symbolizes the how white supremacy is soon from a racist perspective. He explains that hate is more than just a lazy prejudice, it is the violence that goes beyond that. The victims of hate become dangerous over the time, as they cannot overcome their anger and start harming everyone around.
There are different levels of hate and he talks about the different situations of where people have been arrested for hate crimes. This hate divides nations and even families and drawing massive attention to it with hate crime laws is fueling us to be increasingly skeptical of other people different than us.
There are also some individuals that actually enjoy the company of the ones that they condemn. He believes that there is always going to be hate in the world, hate that the world cannot fully eradicate.
Sullivan looks to a better definition of the word hate and gives us one by a psychotherapist names Elisabeth Young-Bruehl, who classifies hate into three categories. Counter Argument Position Paper: Hatred will never be settled, it can only get better in time.
Sullivan believes the crime needs to also be categorized by the perpetrator. To place us into sub-categories is preposterous and a waste of time. The classification of a crime as a hate crime makes it sound a lot worse than it actually is, especially since not everyone can agree on what defines a hate crime as opposed to a normal crime.
Should all violence be treated alike. I have to say that Sullivan uses some persuasive logos appeals which grabbed my attention. You could never fully trust someone because you do not know what is going on in their mind. There is evidence of hate in almost every major crime, so there is usually no need for a separate sub-classification.
This article persuaded me to believe that hate crimes should not exist in modern society. If hate of hated is very common, I question: Is it right to have these feelings of hatred towards their descendents.
Essentially he is believes that crimes motivated by hate should be categorized the same as crimes that are not. And for the son, I can see that kicking was a little extreme but, the gay man did play a role in his anger and hosed him for no reason.
In it, he compares two murders, the first being a brutal, race-related murder committed by an adult of one race against an adult of another and the second, the story of a year-old pregnant girl who was stabbed seventeen times and then left to bleed to death by her year-old boyfriend.
Although many people may believe that they harbor no hatred towards other races, as soon as someone bumps into them in the street or cuts them off at an intersection, they automatically notice his or her race. Hate could be a reason of all the wars history knows.
He goes on to relate the controversy caused by a group of firefighters when one of them mimicked the dragging death of James Byrd, a black man dragged by a pickup truck for three miles down a road in Texas, during a Labor Day parade.
After reading Andrew Sullivan’s “What’s So Bad About Hate?” I began to realize that hate does not possess the same meaning as it did in the past. With the fear of hate came new laws that have taken away the right of free deduction. What’s So Bad about Hate?
“What’s So Bad about Hate” by Andrew Sullivan is an essay that looks into the effectiveness of using the word hate. Sullivan clearly feels that this word is used too often in day to day context. Hate is a strong word and is pretty vague in meaning. Eng. September 12, Reading Response What’s So Bad about Hate?
“What’s So Bad about Hate” by Andrew Sullivan is an essay that looks into the effectiveness of using the word hate. Jul 16, · Reflect on Sullivan reading "What' So Bad About Hate" Reading the article “What’s So Bad About Hate” by Andrew Sullivan, I was impressed by authors’ deep and detailed observation of this human emotion, hate.
Going through some statistics, different kinds of hate crimes rooted in racism, sexism, Nazism, rape. *Analysis of the Essay “What’s So Bad About Hate?” by Andrew Sullivan Pages Step 1 • Sullivan wonders what hate really is since a new offense called a “hate crime” entered into the American criminal law.
Rhetorical Critique on Andrew Sullivan's "What's So Bad About Hate?" word is something I strongly disdain; it exists whether I, or anyone else, approves of it or not. After reading Andrew Sullivan’s “What’s So Bad About Hate?” I began to realize that hate does not possess the same meaning as it did in the past.
hate crime laws.An understanding of hate crime in the essay whats so bad about hate by andrew sullivan